Punch Back Twice As Hard

At TGA we’re non-partisan, which is different than being non-ideological.  We don’t support either party or make endorsements for anything other than GUSA.

But like The Hoya and The Voice, we’re a publication with a viewpoint and seek to shape perceptions within and outside the Georgetown community about what is happening on the Hilltop.  We’re also keen on promoting the ideas and positions we care about.  The difference is The Hoya and The Voice are left-wing liberal Democrat publications while we’re libertarian, conservative, and non-partisan, and unlike them, we'll admit it.

Oh yeah, and unlike us, The Hoya publishes fake news when it's not refusing to report on real news if it makes one of their radical left-wing friends look bad, or slanting the news to promote their liberal ideological agenda, or making the news when they endorse the suppression of speech they don't like and lie about what actually occurred at events.

So don’t mistake this article and the below excerpt as signifying political support for President Trump (PBUH).  The fact is it could have been written by someone from TGA in the last few years.  It discusses the new era we’re in and how to deal with Social Justice Warriors when they seek to attack people for having diverse thoughts.  

It's the exact opposite of what cuckservatives who bend over forward when confronted by their enemies would do.  Make sure you read it twice . . . 

We ought to take a page from the playbook of Trump, who has almost singularly provided us with a golden opportunity to redefine the terms of battle, no longer fighting on leftist ground. For Republicans and conservatives have been liberated from the PC thought police. We are free to fight back when vicious charges are leveled at us designed to instill fear and chill dissent.
As former speaker Newt Gingrich has perceptively noted, Trump has been a masterful media manipulator, getting media members to chase so-called “shiny objects” — “Can you believe Trump said X!?” ad nauseam.
Mr. Trump’s version of stray voltage has a number of effects beyond just causing chaos and distracting his opponents. When everything is an outrage, nothing is an outrage. And when everything is an outrage, you expose yourself as a purely partisan actor, turning off large swaths of the American public.
Trump’s lack of fear of touching politically incorrect third rails that millions of Americans felt, but which had not been articulated so bluntly by a national politician, served him well. Incidentally, it also allowed him to shift the Overton Window on critical issues like immigration and Islamic supremacism.
When attacked for taking these positions, unlike those who came before him, Trump did not avoid the fray. Rather, he jumped into it, counterpunching.
Lulled into a false sense of security by Republicans who fought with their hands tied behind their backs, constrained by suicidal rules of political engagement for decades, the Left did not know how to react when hit.
Leftists could not believe that a political opponent had the gall to actually fight tooth and nail.
Trump does not give an inch to his critics, and neither should any other Republican. He defines the rules of engagement, and so should all on the Right.
Watching the confirmation hearings to date, we see many on the Left jabbing as if we are in a pre-Trump world. Their questions all hew to the same old narrative that if you are not a racist, sexist, or bigot, then you are an out-of-touch plutocrat or a shill for some special interest or other.
Like Trump, Republicans should challenge these charges head on. They should take issue with the Left’s premises from the start, showing that it is the Left who is projecting when it tries to discredit those who believe in capitalism, the power of the individual, and the sanctity of the individual’s rights, the rule of law, national sovereignty, federalism, and the Judeo-Christian morality on which the country is based.
When leftists attack an attorney general designate because he is a white male from the South, they should be attacked for judging based on color of skin (rather than content of character) and for trying to bruise an appointee who will not stand for open borders, selective law enforcement, and politicized justice.
When leftists attack a secretary of education designate because her family is wealthy, they should be attacked for their anti-capitalism and hypocrisy, and their real desire to bloody an appointee because she believes that the Left’s own constituents — and indeed all Americans — should have the opportunity to send their kids to superior schools, rather than being doomed to a subpar education because it mollifies a teachers union.
These attacks are designed to put not only the appointees, but also all right-thinking people on the defensive — to fear reflexively a false premise because those premises have prevailed among the progressives who dominated media, academia, and government for decades.
We should no longer live in fear — for the Left thrives when we self-censor and accept its baseless premises.

For more info on how to fight and win against the left, read Social Justice Warriors Always Lie.  It's a primer on how to react when left-wing liberals progressives attack you.